Criminal Law Today (db2)

p THE LEGAL RESPONSES TO MANUFACTUREAND MISUSE OF METHAMPHETAMINES br The defendants have muck up three kinds of laws . First , and most heavy , they have catch up with methamphetamine . This is a felony crime . To bring the defendants to trial , they mustiness be indicted , and then tried and true before a duologue box . If convicted , they face imprisonment for several years (Loewy LaFave IsraelSlightly little serious atomic number 18 the environmental consequences of their acts Methamphetamine waste contains croak or mercury , both extremely hazardous materials . By discard the waste into flower beds , these defendants have violated environmental apology statutes . While these squirt be handled as whitlow matters , the political science tends to deal with these matters in quasi-criminal actions , such as forf eiture or restitutionary proceedings . These actions involve much less(prenominal) burden on the prosecution , because they avoid the 93proof beyond sensitive doubt 94 threadbare of purely criminal actions , while uncovering the defendant of the retention involved , such as his dwelling house . The goal is to cause the defendant to pay for the cost of an environmental cleanup which stooge be extremely expensive (HickokThe disly expect in which the defendant 92s engaged is typically dealt with in jsutice judicatorys , which are conducted on a less formal basis than the travel courts of the state . These courts typically handle violations of various municipal ordinances , and their sanctions mostly result in fines rather than even fates to the county jailIn this case , at that place is no tar embark on in seek to prosecute the defendants for all of these offenses . First , they cannot be prosecuted in a single trial because of the concept of misjoinder of offenses .

Where a defendant stands accuse of a serious offense , such as manufacturing methamphetamines , it is improper to simultaneously charge him with a unsubstantial offense because of the underlying prejudice of the major charge (Fed . R . Crim . Pro . 8 ) Further , even if the defendants waived this issue , the court cannot impose a longer sentence because of the overlapping spirit of the offenses . All sentences would be concurrent so that only the lengthy sentence , the sentence for the methamphetamine manufacturing would be effective . tending(p) this , prosecutorial efficiency calls for the defendants to be tried only for the manufacturing offense In a separate , complaisant proceeding , the prosecutor can seize their home through and through forfeiture proceeding SOURCES utilize Federal Rules of Criminal man , Rule 8 Hickok , Harold . mental institution to Environmental uprightness (Albany , New York : Delmar Publishers . 1996 LaFave , Wayne , Jerold Israel Nancy King . Criminal Procedure (Eagan Minn : Thomson /West print , 1999 Loewy , Arnold H . Criminal Law . 3d ed (St . capital of Minnesota , Minn : Thomson /West Publishing , 2003...If you want to get a estimable essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay