Three Social Theories And Polygamy

Polygamy and Social TheoriesSocieties typic separately(prenominal)y set up clear boundaries for straight behavior , in to maintain some degree of unity within the group . Although some behaviors that f every(prenominal) outside the median(a) might pass without comment , some groups deviate significantly from the norm , forming sub-cultures . In some cases , sub-cultures that deviate significantly atomic number 18 looked upon with hesitancy . Polygamy is one behavior that deviates significantly from the accepted norms our inn looks upon groups that habituate polygamy such(prenominal) as the Fundamental present(prenominal) Saints (FLDS , with suspicion and often with distrustSeveral theories that discuss how individuals interact within standstill reach significance when used to examine polygamy . In this hunting lo dge , we practice serial monogamy that is , an individual may behavior much than one partner over a sp put uphtliness , scarce is in a committed and exclusive kind blushful with nevertheless one partner at a condemnation (Class Notes . From the fountain of the Mormon Church , of which the FLDS is an offshoot , the polygamous character of its teachings has been conside tearing laudable of suspicion . To understand the reasoning dirty dog this thinking , it is of the essence(predicate) to examine polygamy from the viewpoints of symbolic interactionism , structural functionalism , and conflict opening to have an idea of how the practice interacts on both macro instruction and micro levels of cultureSymbolic Interactionism and PolygamySymbolic interaction theory examines family at a micro level determining how individuals learn the meanss of things in their purlieu (Ballantine , 2006 . In the United States , children soon learn to identify the Stars and mark as being the national flag , they learn astir(predic! ate) apparitional symbols appropriate to their family , and maybe even so the logos of their favorite(a) games , restaurants , or television programs . Over time , they learn otherwisewise(a) symbols , such as words and monetary values and many other things . The symbols learned during this process summarize sh ared meanings with others with whom we interact and rig what is real and normal (Ballantine , 2006 ,. 86 .

In the polygamous residential area , the child learns the symbols of what is normal in that subculture at a real early age . The family is composed of one spawn and many mothers the representation of the faith , at lea st in footing of the Fundamental Latter-Day Saints , is that of a photograph of the illusionist that hangs on the wall of the family home . The games restaurants , and programs that may have meaning to other children have in the FLDS community , in that televisions are command providing no context to the children in the community . Kathy quoted in brownness describes how the prophet Rulon Jeffs was kept changing the context of things even in his own community : some days wearable garments with stripes were bad , other days the color red became forbidden Looking and smiling at members of the opposite agitate was wrong . Symbols such as colors , patterns , and expressions became stripped of all meaning that the greater society provided themStructural Functionalism and PolygamyAccording to Ballantine (2006 ) structural functionalists view society as being composed of interdependent parts , each fulfilling certain necessary functions...If you want to get a coarse of the m ark essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay